Helping a partner regain their performance edge.

An under-performing partner or coworker can bring down the performance of a division or the whole company – this may in turn, affect our end-of-year bonus, profit share or work environment. So, rather than saying that it is her or his problem and letting them be, sometimes it is in our best interest to help the under-achiever.

Recently I was working in a venture with a person that was under-performing and it was bringing the whole partnership productivity down. We were both responsible for parts of the venture that were complementary but mutually exclusive. My problem was how to help her achieve the desired performance without destroying the partnership by being invasive and controlling. The reasons for my decision to help were:

• It seemed fixable (no drug use, alcohol or any of the sorts). 
• Her past performance indicated that she was capable of much more than she was delivering. 
• Dissolving the partnership would have been a complicated and messy affair – and not good for both our reputations. 

My plan was to approach this person and state the problem and my intentions in a clear and respectful manner. I set up an appointment to discuss the situation in a non threatening environment and out of the office. During the conversation I setup myself as a supporter and ally and not a fixer – this is important! You are there to help not do their job (unless it is a problem in your area). At the end of the meeting we established an agreement that we would work on the problems and setup a general plan. Keep it simple.
Over the next few days, we clearly identified the problems, their causes and devised plans to fix and correct each one of them, as well as establishing indicators and goals for each one of them (you have to know when you are done). We identified everything that may be affecting her performance, from rebellious employees to over-dependent clients, and put a plan in place to correct them.
Over time, we tracked our plans and made corrections, while keeping our eyes in our indicators and goals. As problems started to disappear her productivity went back to what was expected and we developed a better working relationship.

Co-working spaces

After a year of travelling (that is the life of the consultant) I am back home with the dreaded notion of having to find a place to call "my office" - home is not an option as the capacity for distractions is so high that it makes it a bad option for me - you have to know yourself and how you function best.

After visiting some colleagues in Boston, I decided to try a co-working space in Miami in a place called Buro. After a few days the experience has been a very positive one. I can work with minimal distractions and it feels the same as an office (with the added benefit that the boss or client are not there). In this case the decor is very nice and the view from the floor is very Miami (lots of palm trees and sun).

I will keep you posted on my experience as it progresses.

What to do with self-sabotaging people – Part 1

I was just in a discussion with one of my Linkedin groups as to how to handle people who are self-sabotaging. First things first, how do you spot a self-sabotaging person? Here are a few of their characteristics:

 

1. Self-sabotaging people are aware of what needs to be done, but do something else.
2. They stop learning and listening - they believe they already know what they need to know.
3. They stop asking for counsel or use the wrong advisors [we should use only wise and trusted advisors].
4. They spend their energy in menial things and events; they don’t pick their fights – they sweat the small stuff and everything is a conflict to the death.
5. They’re forever looking at the past: what mistakes they made, what [they think] people did to them, how they were wronged.
6. They are always looking at the future [but do nothing to achieve it] – they wish upon every star but never lift a finger to make things happen.
7. They make excuses for their behavior and don’t take responsibility – my parents treated me bad, my [condition] excuses my [behavior].
8. They believe the labels they apply to themselves – I am [neurotic, unlucky, ugly, fat] so I can’t change [something]
9. They always believe things are too difficult and find the negative in everything.

They not only waste their time, but yours. They come into your office and take precious energy away from people and things that really need it, they leave you exhausted and little less alive than before, they don’t leave anything behind but stress and desperation. But, what should you do with them? In my next post, I will present a good list of solid advice as to how to handle this type of person.

Use your longer term employees to fuel and drive strategy success

With low confidence in the economic recovery, a lot of companies are filling their work needs using project based employment and short term hires. For your short term operational needs, these are great sources of relatively cheap labor (I will discuss this in another post). But for strategic initiatives, you need people thinking about the long term success, not just next quarter or the end of the project. The incentives for short term work by their definition are not aligned with long term objectives. Why would temporary employees care about the welfare of the company three years down the road if their involvement ends in one month?

For strategic initiatives you need longer term employees - people who will face the consequences of their actions and decisions. They also provide cohesiveness from one project to the next, and make decisions based on the long range business goals and not only on the short term project objectives. They represent and transmit the culture of your company. They provide the history and traditions that have made you a success in the past.

Expecting too much too soon

I had a client who asked me to implement new key performance indicators in a month (they had nothing at the time) - yes, zero to implementation in a month. The KPIs he was asking for were very deep and complex, they didn't have the necessary systems in place, and the alternative was to capture the basic data manually (not really an option in most cases). Because of my objections as to the impossibility of the request, he gave the project to somebody who didn't say no. Six months later, no indicators. They restarted the process 4 more times with the same results.

For all of their effort, they seemed unwilling to grasp how their choices of process and conditions were making it impossible to obtain meaningful information. Even if all went well, the first few data collections are plagued with errors, personnel aren't clear what you are asking of them or are afraid to give it to you. As for interpretation: You don't have a baseline to compare them to (is that 7 in indicador 3 good or bad?) and you don't have a tendency (is it improving or getting worse, is more better or worse?).

How do you know if your expectations are too much? Read their body language! If you see:

1. Uncomfortable smiles
2. Weight shifting
3. Darting eyes - nobody looks at you in the eyes but look at each other worriedly
   

That usually means you are off base in your request. You have to realize that if nobody believes it can be done, then it probably wont get done. Trust your team advisers - otherwise, why have them? On a side note, if your team doesn't' give you straight or honest answers, you better rethink your communications and leadership skills.

The point here is that you have to be realistic on your expectations - if you ask for the impossible again and again you will lose credibility - the result is that nobody takes him seriously anymore and the work they do produce is more made up than a ride at Disney.

Thinking traps

I was reading an interesting blog post by Litemind about thinking traps. A lot of them have to do with our natural bias:

• Thinking we are better than we are (overconfidence in our abilities, memory, intuition or gut)
  
• Trying to confirm decisions we already made (shopping for confirmation, protecting our status quo or sunk costs)
  
• Unquestioning our thoughts and assumptions

We can avoid some of the traps by talking to people who hold different points of view. This article reminded me why it is important to have diversity in our teams. Our teams can protect us from some of the traps. There is one trap that is not in the article and that is intrinsic to groups: the "group think" trap. This trap makes the team assume one position or opinion and none others are considered (from wikipedia: groupthink).

To avoid falling into "group think" we have to make sure that dissenting opinions are heard, that timid or softspoken team members get a change to talk, and that critical thinking is always on the table. As a team lead or member, we all share that responsibility. Remember that this trap can make a team behave like lemmings and jump off the cliff.

Going to the moon

Today we are celebrating the 40th anniversary of the US moon walk. This gives us a great opportunity to think about setting challenging goals for our companies, departments and endeavors. If we do not challenge ourselves, the status quo and everyone around us, we will find ourselves in the same spot year after year.

“We can challenge ourselves to do great things again by joining forces, cooperatively, with patience and perseverance, by setting our objectives high and helping other people to join us in the quest for expansion of our thinking, of our capabilities.” – Buzz Aldrin

Note: For those of you who don't know, Buzz Aldrin is the astronaut that piloted the lunar module of NASA’s Apollo 11 who took him and Neil Armstrong to the moon.